Oh right I see, you're wrong so now you double down on the minutia of sentence construction. Where I'm from this is how people phrase such a statement - it's common to use "less than" rather than "fewer" also, so to coin another local phrase "bugger off".
No it's not. Your original assertion was that only old vehicles without ECU require high octane fuel. Your statement about carrying a heavy person has no bearing on engine output either, yes it will affect fuel economy but a fat bloke doesn't cause engine knock.
It's clear you don't understand...
Run at a lower power output and be less economical as I stated originally (and crucially require the ECU to intervene more often to reduce knock, hence the lower power output, this in itself is bad for the engine and is warned about in the owners manual - eg don't cane it when using lower octane...
What a daft argument. Your thinking is decades behind. The manufacturers map the engine ECU to take advantage of the higher octane and the quoted horsepower is based on the use of this fuel. Engine power output is a function of fuel/air and timing or retardation - the accelerator merely controls...
It's not just old cars. Many modern performance cars (VW Golf R, Audi "S" and "RS" models and plenty others) recommend 98+ Octane for full performance. Of course they can run on 95 but this will result in lower power output and lower MPG.
Given that the US has ably demonstrated that they've dispensed with science in favour of ridiculous tribal politics, I'm more of the opinion that we should ignore anything to do with virus/vaccine or erm anything emanating from that continent.
The statements made by the CDC about transmission...
I said credible source. Eg a Researcher/Academic, expert in their field, who understands the problem domain and has produced a peer reviewed paper on the subject as opposed to a journalist writing to get a frothy response from their gullible readers.
Oh and shock horror Police force which uses...
lmao it doesn't reduce crime at all. It's not pathetic or pointless to be concerned for your own privacy or wanting to go about your business without baseless interruption.
It's pathetic to suggest that an innocent person should just accept we're all criminals until we prove we're not.
Knowing that I'm not a criminal I'd rather quite like to go about my business without being stopped, let alone searched.
A friend was stopped years ago in the early hours:
Officer: Where are you going at this time?
Him: Work
Officer: Funny time to be going to work
Him: You're at work aren't...