Recent content by Brigadier

And where are they now, eh? Dead, that's where. Exactly ;-)

As would the Tories of her; that's the pantomime that is politics. Are you a Tory MP?

You've softened your stance that she will be found guilty then, to "found to have lied". (Softened = rowed back on previous hyperbole (y) )

10000+ posts in a little over 2 years points to the above being bowlogs. Although, in the interests of fairness, little if any thought has gone into many of those posts.

Have you considered a hobby? ;-)

I doubt any rational person would even consider it to be arguable. But the chances of them reporting anything: about as likely as anyone else doing the same, in a similar situation.

And over millions of years. Single (cooling) volcanoes were eruptions over the course of days, weeks, or months, usually.

Just picking out the volcanism point: Who is "they"? While there is clear evidence that volcanoes do cause climatic cooling, evidence for them causing climatic warming is debatable at present. "Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a greenhouse gas and is the primary gas blamed for climate...

Can't be banned if you never passed in the first place ;-) :ROFLMAO:

Get to the car wash. Book an eye test. Some refresher driving lessons.....

Prepare yourself for this rebuttal ;-)

Taken by a friend, on Friday

Let's do this logically, shall we? Source? And you'd be correct; those phrases are for politicians, journalists, ............... I wouldn't expect those phrases from scientists, not in their papers anyway. Scientists would provide evidenced papers which, if they can be verified or are likely...

Going forward, yes. That is the prediction part. All supported by measurements and readings. Funnily enough, computer simulations of yesteryear are being shown, there or thereabouts, to be accurate. In that they're being borne out by what we're experiencing right now. Postulate - model -...

Still nothing then.